PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

From Bench to Chairside: Collagen Scaffolds in Combination with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Gingival Augmentation

Koteneva P, Kosheleva N, et al.

Dentistry Journal

Sechenov University, Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study compared three collagen-based xenogeneic scaffolds—Fibro-Gide, FibroMATRIX, and Mucoderm—for gingival augmentation, both alone and combined with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Mechanical, structural, and in vivo analyses revealed that FibroMATRIX provided an optimal balance between stiffness, porosity, and bioactivity. Micro-CT, indentation, and histology demonstrated that FibroMATRIX supported greater vascularization and tissue integration than Fibro-Gide or Mucoderm. FibroMATRIX + MSCs yielded higher lamina propria thickness and vessel density, while Fibro-Gide inhibited angiogenesis due to dense architecture. Results demonstrate that scaffold stiffness and porosity critically influence gingival regeneration outcomes.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

Mechanical indentation was performed using a CellScale MicroTester G2 (Waterloo, Canada) in displacement-controlled mode. Hydrated collagen scaffolds were tested in PBS using a 12 N/m cantilever and 500 µm spherical tip to depths of 300–400 µm at 30 µm/s with a 30 s hold period. Indentation data were analyzed using Hertz and Lee–Radok models to calculate instantaneous (E₀) and equilibrium (E∞) moduli. FibroMATRIX and Fibro-Gide exhibited similar stiffness, while Mucoderm was ~4× stiffer. The MicroTester G2 allowed precise quantification of scaffold stiffness and viscoelastic properties relevant to tissue integration.
AUTHORS

Polina Koteneva, Nastasia Kosheleva, Alexey Fayzullin, Yana Khristidis, Egor Bunin, Yuri Efremov, Diana Zhukova, Sergey Tkachev, Aida Kulova, Timur Rasulov, Anna Vedyaeva, Tatiana Brailovskaya, Peter Timashev.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Dentistry Journal

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

Sechenov University, Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

COUNTRIES

Russia

INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

TESTING METHODS

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Dental & Oral Tissue BiomechanicsScaffold Mechanical TestingSkin and Wound Healing BiomechanicsStem Cell Mechanobiology

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

3D fractal topography attenuates inflammation and confers resilience to glomerular podocytes

Wang Y, Dikyol C, et al.

Cell Biomaterials

MicroTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingMechanotransductionOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

2026

Mechanically graded granular scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering

Mierswa SC, Wheeler EE, et al.

Biomaterials Advances

MicroTester

Compression TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Bone Tissue Engineering & MechanicsCartilage and Meniscus MechanicsScaffold Mechanical Testing

2026

3D-printed scaffolds encapsulating red-blood-cell-derived extracellular vesicles for microRNA delivery

Huang C, Jayasinghe MK, et al.

Cell Biomaterials

MicroTester

Compression TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

3D Bioprinting & Bioink Materials TestingDrug Screening & Drug Delivery MechanicsNeural Tissue & CNS MechanicsScaffold Mechanical Testing

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: