PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2009

Strain Uniformity in Biaxial Specimens Is Highly Sensitive to Attachment Details

A tensile test divider icon

Eilaghi A, Flanagan JG, et al.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, Imperial College London

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study examined how specimen geometry and attachment details influence strain field uniformity during planar biaxial mechanical testing. Finite element modeling and experimental validation demonstrated that the number, spacing, and placement accuracy of attachment points strongly affect the size and magnitude of the uniform-strain region within a specimen. Subtle irregularities in attachment point positioning significantly degraded strain uniformity, particularly under nonequibiaxial loading conditions, while apron geometry had comparatively little effect. Experiments using rubber specimens confirmed model predictions, highlighting that actual specimen strain can differ substantially from nominal strain based on actuator motion. The findings establish critical design guidelines for reliable biaxial testing of small biological and polymeric specimens.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

Experimental biaxial testing was conducted using a CellScale BioTester 5000 equipped with BioRakes to apply controlled equibiaxial and nonequibiaxial tensile strains to thin rubber specimens. The CellScale system enabled precise control of attachment geometry and synchronized force application with high-resolution optical tracking of surface markers. Integrated image tracking software generated full-field strain maps, allowing direct comparison between experimental data and finite element predictions. CellScale-based testing was essential for validating computational models and for establishing best-practice guidelines to ensure strain uniformity and accurate stress–strain measurements in biaxial mechanical testing.
AUTHORS

Armin Eilaghi, John G. Flanagan, G. Wayne Brodland, C. Ross Ethier.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

YEAR

2009

INSTITUTIONS

University of Toronto, University of Waterloo, Imperial College London

COUNTRIES

Canada, United Kingdom

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

TESTING METHODS

Biaxial TestingDigital Image Correlation (DIC)Micro-Mechanical TestingTensile Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Membranes and Thin Films MechanicsOphthalmic Biomechanics & Corneal Tissue EngineeringPolymers and Elastomers Testing

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Postpartum biomechanical adaptations of the anterior abdominal wall in a rat model: Implications for diastasis rectus abdominis

Lax M, Morgan M, et al.

Clinical Biomechanics

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPelvic Floor and Gynecological Biomechanics

2026

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Patient-Specific Direct 3D-Printed Aortic Valve for Simulation Trainings: A Comparative Study

Cheheili Sobbi S, Pavlykova-Chertovska A, et al.

Innovations

BioTester

Digital Image Correlation (DIC)Tensile Testing

Cardiac Tissue Engineering & MechanicsHeart Valve Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPolymers and Elastomers Testing

2026

Chronic kidney disease and stromal cell-derived factor 1α peptide-functionalization impact on polycarbonate-bisurea based in situ tissue-engineered vascular graft dynamics

Krebber MM, Besseling PJ, et al.

Scientific Reports

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Material Fatigue and DurabilityScaffold Mechanical TestingVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes