PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

Design of MOF/soja based-resin scaffolds by 3D resin printing technique

A tensile test divider icon

Zurita-Mendez NN, Carbajal De la Torre G, et al.

MRS Advances

Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study fabricated hybrid porous scaffolds by stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing using a UV-curable soy-based commercial resin (Anycubic) reinforced with low loadings of the iron-based metal–organic framework MIL-88A (0.01 wt% and 0.03 wt%). MIL-88A was synthesized via a hydrothermal route (FeCl3·6H2O + fumaric acid) and incorporated into resin by high-speed mixing before printing cylindrical porous scaffolds (0.5 mm designed pore size). Composite scaffolds were characterized by FTIR/XRD (confirming MIL-88A formation), SEM/EDS (rod-like MIL-88A morphology and dispersion within printed resin), and in vitro immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF) and PBS to assess bioactivity and biodegradation over 9–28 days. Weight-loss data indicated modest degradation in PBS (~1.4–1.6%) and higher loss in SBF (~2.3–2.5% for control and 0.01 wt%, higher/variable for 0.03 wt%). Overall, MIL-88A inclusion maintained printability and porous architecture while supporting bioactivity/biodegradability profiles consistent with tissue engineering scaffold requirements.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

UniVert

Mechanical compression testing of the 3D-printed resin and MOF–resin scaffolds was performed using a CellScale UniVert universal testing machine. Five specimens per formulation (control resin scaffold, 0.01 wt% MIL-88A, 0.03 wt% MIL-88A) were compressed to 25% strain (25% deformation from initial length) to generate average stress–strain curves and compare compressive strength and deformation resistance. The UniVert results showed the control scaffold reached a peak stress of ~5.8 MPa, 0.01 wt% MIL-88A increased peak stress to ~6.5 MPa (improved compressive strength), and 0.03 wt% MIL-88A improved ductility/toughness with the best deformation resistance among groups.
AUTHORS

Zurita-Méndez, N.N., Carbajal De la Torre, G., Maldonado-Garcia, I., Espinosa-Medina, M.A..

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

MRS Advances

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo

COUNTRIES

Mexico

INSTRUMENT USED

UniVert

TESTING METHODS

Compression Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

3D Bioprinting & Bioink Materials TestingBone Tissue Engineering & MechanicsInjectable & Regenerative BiomaterialsScaffold Mechanical Testing

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

State-Programmable Conductive and Reactivatable Bio-Adhesive for High-Fidelity Epidermal Biointerfaces

Ahmed S, Momin M, et al.

Small

UniVert

Peel TestingTensile Testing

Adhesives and Sealants TestingPolymers and Elastomers TestingWearable Bioelectronics

2026

Semisolid extrusion 3D printing for pharmaceutical compounding: influence of active ingredients on alginate-based inks and tailored-dosage forms properties

Falcone G, Amante C, et al.

Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications

UniVert

Compression Testing

3D Bioprinting & Bioink Materials TestingDrug Screening & Drug Delivery MechanicsHydrogel Mechanical TestingPolymers and Elastomers Testing

2026

Deep Learning-Based Inclusion Boundary Identification Using Wave Propagation in Optical Coherence Elastography

Zhang G, Liao J, et al.

Journal of Biophotonics

UniVert

Compression Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingSkin and Wound Healing Biomechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes