PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2023

Biomechanical Properties of the Aortic Root Are Distinct from Those of the Ascending Aorta in Both Normal and Aneurysmal States

A tensile test divider icon

Chung JC, Eliathamby D, et al.

JTCVS Open

University Health Network, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Ted Rogers Center for Heart Research

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study performed a comprehensive biomechanical comparison of human aortic root and ascending aortic tissue in both normal and aneurysmal states to determine whether these anatomically distinct regions exhibit different mechanical behaviors. Using ex vivo human tissue, the authors quantified stiffness, energy dissipation, and resistance to interlamellar separation. The aortic root exhibited greater viscoelastic energy loss and higher delamination strength than the ascending aorta in the normal state. In aneurysmal tissue, delamination strength was significantly reduced in both regions, but only the ascending aorta showed concurrent increases in stiffness and energy loss. Aging and hypertension were strongly associated with reduced aortic root strength, whereas aortic diameter was not. These findings demonstrate that aortic root biomechanics are distinct from those of the ascending aorta and suggest that region-specific mechanical parameters may be required for improved aneurysm risk assessment.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

Ex vivo mechanical testing of human aortic root and ascending aortic tissue was performed using a CellScale BioTester. Square tissue specimens were mounted using BioRake tines and subjected to displacement-controlled biaxial tensile testing to quantify tangent modulus of elasticity and viscoelastic energy loss. Adjacent rectangular specimens were tested using uniaxial delamination (peel) testing to measure resistance to interlamellar separation, a surrogate metric for aortic dissection risk. All mechanical testing was conducted submerged in Ringer’s lactate solution maintained at 37 °C during testing, ensuring physiologically relevant hydration and temperature control. Force–displacement data were used to derive regional and disease-dependent biomechanical parameters.
AUTHORS

Jennifer C.-Y. Chung; Daniella Eliathamby; Hijun Seo; Chun-Po Fan; Rifat Islam; Karamvir Deol; Craig A. Simmons; Maral Ouzounian.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

JTCVS Open

YEAR

2023

INSTITUTIONS

University Health Network, University of Toronto, The Hospital for Sick Children, Ted Rogers Center for Heart Research

COUNTRIES

Canada

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

TESTING METHODS

Biaxial TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingPeel TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Cardiac Tissue Engineering & MechanicsECM & Decellularized Matrix MechanicsFibrosis & Tissue RemodelingMechanotransductionVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Postpartum biomechanical adaptations of the anterior abdominal wall in a rat model: Implications for diastasis rectus abdominis

Lax M, Morgan M, et al.

Clinical Biomechanics

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPelvic Floor and Gynecological Biomechanics

2026

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Patient-Specific Direct 3D-Printed Aortic Valve for Simulation Trainings: A Comparative Study

Cheheili Sobbi S, Pavlykova-Chertovska A, et al.

Innovations

BioTester

Digital Image Correlation (DIC)Tensile Testing

Cardiac Tissue Engineering & MechanicsHeart Valve Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPolymers and Elastomers Testing

2026

A deep neural network surrogate for fast mechanical parameter identification using the ring tensile test

Utrera A, Navarrete Á, et al.

Materials & Design

BioTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

MechanotransductionVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes