PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

From Bench to Chairside: Collagen Scaffolds in Combination with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Gingival Augmentation

A tensile test divider icon

Koteneva P, Kosheleva N, et al.

Dentistry Journal

Sechenov University, Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study compared three collagen-based xenogeneic scaffolds—Fibro-Gide, FibroMATRIX, and Mucoderm—for gingival augmentation, both alone and combined with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Mechanical, structural, and in vivo analyses revealed that FibroMATRIX provided an optimal balance between stiffness, porosity, and bioactivity. Micro-CT, indentation, and histology demonstrated that FibroMATRIX supported greater vascularization and tissue integration than Fibro-Gide or Mucoderm. FibroMATRIX + MSCs yielded higher lamina propria thickness and vessel density, while Fibro-Gide inhibited angiogenesis due to dense architecture. Results demonstrate that scaffold stiffness and porosity critically influence gingival regeneration outcomes.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

Mechanical indentation was performed using a CellScale MicroTester G2 (Waterloo, Canada) in displacement-controlled mode. Hydrated collagen scaffolds were tested in PBS using a 12 N/m cantilever and 500 µm spherical tip to depths of 300–400 µm at 30 µm/s with a 30 s hold period. Indentation data were analyzed using Hertz and Lee–Radok models to calculate instantaneous (E₀) and equilibrium (E∞) moduli. FibroMATRIX and Fibro-Gide exhibited similar stiffness, while Mucoderm was ~4× stiffer. The MicroTester G2 allowed precise quantification of scaffold stiffness and viscoelastic properties relevant to tissue integration.
AUTHORS

Polina Koteneva, Nastasia Kosheleva, Alexey Fayzullin, Yana Khristidis, Egor Bunin, Yuri Efremov, Diana Zhukova, Sergey Tkachev, Aida Kulova, Timur Rasulov, Anna Vedyaeva, Tatiana Brailovskaya, Peter Timashev.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Dentistry Journal

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

Sechenov University, Central Research Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery

COUNTRIES

Russia

INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

TESTING METHODS

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Dental & Oral Tissue BiomechanicsScaffold Mechanical TestingSkin and Wound Healing BiomechanicsStem Cell Mechanobiology

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Bioprinting of a human neuron model for quantifying pollutant toxicity

Yao E, Chen S, Lu G, Sun C, Nguyen QT

International Journal of Bioprinting

MicroTester

Compression TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

3D Bioprinting & Bioink Materials TestingHydrogel Mechanical TestingNeural Tissue & CNS MechanicsOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

2026

Biomechanics and composition of fixed neurocranial tessellated cartilage from the neurocranium of four mobulid ray species with different depth ranges

Hinrichs T, Zhong J, Chang CW, et al.

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

MicroTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Cartilage and Meniscus Mechanics

2026

FGF-2 signaling dominance in TGF-β1/FGF-2–primed nasoseptal chondrocytes for cartilage tissue engineering

Ma Z, Grimes K, et al.

Journal of Tissue Engineering

MicroTester

Compression TestingMicro-Mechanical TestingStress Relaxation TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

Cartilage and Meniscus MechanicsMicrotissue and Spheroid Mechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes