PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2026

Mechanical Tuning of the Cell Microenvironment Using a Biomimetic Hydrogel System for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering

A tensile test divider icon

van Mourik M, Spierings J, et al.

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Eindhoven University of Technology, University of Stuttgart

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study investigated whether articular chondrocyte microenvironmental stiffness could be tuned independently from bulk construct stiffness to improve cartilage tissue engineering outcomes. The authors compared articular chondrocytes cultured directly in low-stiffness GelMA, directly in high-stiffness GelMA, or encapsulated in soft agarose microgels embedded within high-stiffness GelMA. Articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells were also evaluated as an alternative cell source using the same encapsulated microgel approach. These constructs were placed into porcine osteochondral defects and cultured for 28 days under dynamic compression-sliding stimulation intended to mimic gait. The study found that encapsulating cells in soft agarose microgels within a stiffer bulk hydrogel improved pericellular matrix structure and depth uniformity, particularly through increased perlecan synthesis and more complete PCM coverage around cells. While low-stiffness GelMA produced the highest overall GAG content, matrix deposition in the non-encapsulated groups was more depth-dependent, with stronger ECM synthesis near the top surface and weaker Type-II collagen staining in deeper regions. Encapsulated chondrocytes showed more homogeneous ECM and PCM formation throughout construct depth, suggesting that a soft local cell microenvironment combined with a stiffer load-transmitting bulk material can improve tissue-depth uniformity. Encapsulated articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells behaved similarly to encapsulated chondrocytes, supporting their potential as an alternative cell source, although their total GAG content was lower after 28 days. Overall, the study supports differential tuning of local and bulk hydrogel mechanics as a promising strategy for more functional articular cartilage tissue engineering.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

A CellScale MicroTester was used to perform indentation testing on Day 0 to quantify the apparent modulus of the hydrogel-filled osteochondral defect constructs. The tested groups included low-stiffness GelMA with articular chondrocytes, high-stiffness GelMA with articular chondrocytes, high-stiffness GelMA containing agarose-microgel-encapsulated articular chondrocytes, and high-stiffness GelMA containing agarose-microgel-encapsulated articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells. The osteochondral plugs with cell-laden hydrogels were immersed in PBS at room temperature during testing. A 1.5 mm spherical indenter attached to a 0.56 mm microbeam was centered over the defect, and the samples were indented for five cycles. Each cycle applied vertical indentation equal to 10% of the sample’s cartilage thickness, manually set using the MicroTester camera and crosshairs, with a 20 second loading phase at 0.5% indentation per second and a 10 second unloading phase. Force and indentation depth were determined from optically recorded cantilever deflection and analyzed using an in-house MATLAB algorithm based on a Hertz contact model for a spherical indenter. The MicroTester results confirmed that high-stiffness GelMA constructs had higher apparent modulus than low-stiffness GelMA, while embedding agarose microgels into high-stiffness GelMA reduced the apparent modulus but not significantly. These measurements verified the starting mechanical properties of the engineered cartilage constructs before 28 days of bioreactor culture.
AUTHORS

Marloes van Mourik, Janne Spierings, Pinar Koca, Florencia Abinzano, Gabriele Addario, Corrinus C. van Donkelaar, Keita Ito, Jasper Foolen.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

YEAR

2026

INSTITUTIONS

Eindhoven University of Technology, University of Stuttgart

COUNTRIES

Germany, Netherlands

INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

TESTING METHODS

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Cartilage and Meniscus MechanicsCell Laden HydrogelsHydrogel Mechanical TestingMechanotransductionScaffold Mechanical Testing

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

3D fractal topography attenuates inflammation and confers resilience to glomerular podocytes

Wang Y, Dikyol C, et al.

Cell Biomaterials

MicroTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingMechanotransductionOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

2026

Mechanically graded granular scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering

Mierswa SC, Wheeler EE, et al.

Biomaterials Advances

MicroTester

Compression TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Bone Tissue Engineering & MechanicsCartilage and Meniscus MechanicsScaffold Mechanical Testing

2026

Tailorable Hydrogel Fibers from High-Yield Recombinant Hagfish Intermediate Filament Proteins: A New Frontier in Biomimetic Materials

Bell BE, Wasserman O, et al.

ACS Omega

MicroTester

Flexural and Bending TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingMembranes and Thin Films Mechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes