PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2022

Cross-Evaluation of Stiffness Measurement Methods for Hydrogels

A tensile test divider icon

Richbourg N R, Rausch M K, et al.

Polymer

The University of Texas at Austin

RESEARCH SUMMARY
Hydrogel stiffness is commonly reported across the literature, but direct comparison is frequently confounded by differences in testing approach and analysis assumptions. In this study, the authors created a controlled library of 18 covalently crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogel formulations by varying two synthesis-defined structural parameters: initial polymer volume fraction (φ0 = 5, 7.5, 10%) and the ideal degree of polymerization between junctions (Nj = 20–70). They then cross-evaluated five widely used stiffness measurement approaches—uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, shear rheology, macroindentation, and nanoindentation—by converting each dataset to an effective shear modulus under incompressible neo-Hookean assumptions. Across the library, the different methods produced broadly similar stiffness values (differences typically small compared with formulation-to-formulation changes), but each method provided distinct secondary insights and practical tradeoffs (e.g., tensile testing with digital image correlation (DIC) enabled estimation of Poisson’s ratio and highlighted the importance of local strain measurement; rheology quantified viscoelastic fraction; indentation enabled assessment of surface-scale heterogeneity). Experimentally measured stiffness increased with increasing φ0 and decreased with increasing Nj, consistent with rubberlike elasticity expectations. The authors also implemented an a priori structure-based stiffness prediction workflow using the swollen polymer network model (predict swelling first, then shear modulus) and showed that while trends matched, the model systematically overestimated stiffness, especially for more dilute but highly crosslinked networks—implicating limitations in the equilibrium swelling component rather than the rubberlike elasticity component. Overall, the work provides a practical framework for comparing hydrogel stiffness across measurement modalities and for rational hydrogel design using structure-informed predictions.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

UniVert

Uniaxial tensile experiments were performed using a CellScale UniVert tester with a water bath and an attached camera for DIC to generate shear modulus measurements and validate key assumptions (incompressibility via Poisson’s ratio) for equilibrium-swollen PVA hydrogels. Dog-bone specimens (gage region ~30 × 10 mm; thickness ~1.5–2.5 mm depending on swelling) were punched from swollen hydrogel films, speckled with graphite for DIC, mounted using shoulder-supported grips designed for soft hydrogels, and fully submerged in PBS during testing. Samples were subjected to two loading cycles of 6 mm extension at 0.33 mm/s, with force measured using a 2 N load cell. UniVert DIC software was used to compute local strain in the homogeneous gauge region (and lateral strain for Poisson’s ratio), and tensile stress–stretch data were fit to the incompressible neo-Hookean boundary value problem to identify shear modulus. In the study’s cross-method comparison, the UniVert+DIC tensile method was highlighted as the most reliable stiffness measurement modality among those evaluated, principally because local strain measurement mitigated artifacts from grip slip and global displacement errors, and because DIC-enabled Poisson’s ratio estimates supported the incompressibility assumption used to interpret stiffness as a shear modulus.
AUTHORS

Nathan R. Richbourg, Manuel K. Rausch, Nicholas A. Peppas.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Polymer

YEAR

2022

INSTITUTIONS

The University of Texas at Austin

COUNTRIES

United States

INSTRUMENT USED

UniVert

TESTING METHODS

Compression TestingDigital Image Correlation (DIC)Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingShear TestingTensile TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingMechanotransductionPolymers and Elastomers Testing

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

MCC950-loaded silk microgel-hydrogel composite scaffolds effectively modulate inflammation for improving tissue interaction and remodeling

Lau K, Grant A, et al.

Acta Biomaterialia

UniVert

Compression Testing

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingHydrogel Mechanical TestingInjectable & Regenerative BiomaterialsScaffold Mechanical Testing

2026

Effect of Sulfated Polysaccharides and Laponite in Composite Porous Scaffolds on Osteogenesis

Karamesouti A, Chatzinikolaidou M

Biomolecules

UniVert

Compression TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled Testing

Bone Tissue Engineering & MechanicsHydrogel Mechanical TestingScaffold Mechanical Testing

2026

Harnessing Chain Mobility via Protonation for Tough and Isotropic Hydrogel

Shi P, Si M, et al.

Advanced Materials

UniVert

Fatigue TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingPolymers and Elastomers TestingSoft Robotics Materials

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes