PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2026

Viscoelastic Properties of Porcine Pericardium Under Biaxial Tensile Creep and Stress Relaxation: Application for Novel Aortic Valve Bioprosthesis Design

Matjeka E, Kuchumov A G, et al.

Bioengineering

University of South Africa, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Durban University of Technology

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study quantified time-dependent biaxial viscoelastic behavior of Landrace porcine pericardium to support durable aortic valve bioprosthesis design and long-term FSI simulation. Square pericardium specimens (10 mm × 10 mm) were harvested from 51-week-old pigs, mounted for equibiaxial loading, and tested in PBS at 37°C. The authors performed biaxial tensile creep tests by sustaining a 0.5 N equibiaxial load for 30 minutes, and biaxial stress relaxation tests by imposing a constant 10% equibiaxial strain for 30 minutes. Across seven experiments, the radial direction was more compliant (higher strain), but the time-dependent creep evolution in circumferential and radial directions was statistically similar at 1, 60, 300, 900, and 1800 seconds; after 30 minutes, mean creep deformation was 3303 × 10^-6 (circumferential) and 5192.9 × 10^-6 (radial). Stress relaxation showed higher stresses in the circumferential direction than radial direction, with both directions relaxing at similar rates; after 30 minutes, stresses were ~15.28 kPa (circumferential) and ~9.6 kPa (radial). To enable computational use, viscoelastic constitutive parameters were identified using Prony-series representations: a generalized Kelvin–Voigt model for creep (R² ≈ 0.96 circumferential and 0.98 radial) and a generalized Maxwell model for stress relaxation (R² ≈ 0.89 circumferential and 0.75 radial), optimized via the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. The resulting parameter sets are positioned as inputs for finite element and FSI simulations to predict long-term leaflet fatigue, sealing, and performance in novel aortic valve bioprostheses.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

Biaxial viscoelastic mechanical testing was performed using a CellScale BioTester 5000 biaxial testing machine in a temperature-controlled PBS bath at 37°C. Porcine pericardium specimens (10 mm × 10 mm) were gripped equibiaxially using biorakes and mounted on the BioTester’s sample plate. The system’s four goosenecks (each with a 23 N load cell) applied tension along circumferential and radial axes, with calibration loads used to validate force–displacement readings. Two-stage preconditioning was applied to reduce hysteresis: (i) 5 cycles loading to 1 N for 20 s with 20 s unloading, then (ii) 10 cycles loading to 1 N with a 90 s hold at peak load. For creep, a sustained equibiaxial load of 0.5 N was applied for 30 min while deformation versus time was recorded in both directions. For stress relaxation, a constant 10% equibiaxial strain was imposed for 30 min while force/stress decay was recorded. BioTester output provided the primary experimental datasets used to (1) compare circumferential vs radial viscoelastic responses and (2) fit Prony-series parameters (Kelvin–Voigt for creep; Maxwell for relaxation) for downstream FE/FSI modeling.
AUTHORS

Edward Matjeka, Alex G. Kuchumov, Harry M. Ngwangwa, Thanyani Pandelani, Fulufhelo Nemavhola.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Bioengineering

YEAR

2026

INSTITUTIONS

University of South Africa, Sirius University of Science and Technology, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Durban University of Technology

COUNTRIES

Russia, South Africa

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

TESTING METHODS

Biaxial TestingCreep TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingStress Relaxation Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Cardiac Tissue Engineering & MechanicsHeart Valve Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Postpartum biomechanical adaptations of the anterior abdominal wall in a rat model: Implications for diastasis rectus abdominis

Lax M, Morgan M, et al.

Clinical Biomechanics

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPelvic Floor and Gynecological Biomechanics

2026

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Patient-Specific Direct 3D-Printed Aortic Valve for Simulation Trainings: A Comparative Study

Cheheili Sobbi S, Pavlykova-Chertovska A, et al.

Innovations

BioTester

Digital Image Correlation (DIC)Tensile Testing

Cardiac Tissue Engineering & MechanicsHeart Valve Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPolymers and Elastomers Testing

2026

A deep neural network surrogate for fast mechanical parameter identification using the ring tensile test

Utrera A, Navarrete Á, et al.

Materials & Design

BioTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

MechanotransductionVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: