PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

The Nonlinear Visco-Hyperelastic Damage Mechanics of Individual Electrospun Polycaprolactone Fibers: Experiments and Modeling

Granhold SL, Madariaga A, et al.

Advanced Engineering Materials

The University of Texas at Austin, Boston University

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This work quantified the nonlinear visco-hyperelastic and damage mechanics of individual electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) fibers and formulated a thermodynamically consistent constitutive model. Fibers exhibited strain-stiffening, strain-hardening, hysteresis, and Mullins-type damage under cyclic loading up to 100 % strain (Figs. 3–5 pp. 3–5). Energy-partition analysis showed that elastic storage dominated at low strain, while dissipation through viscoelastic and damage processes increased to 60–80 % at large strains. The fitted Ogden–Simo-based model achieved NMSE ≈ 0.99 and identified twofold increases in shear modulus (460 → 850 MPa) and strain-stiffening parameter α (3.6 → 7.1) with rising strain. Findings clarify how microscale PCL fibers govern macroscopic network behavior in electrospun biomaterials and inform predictive fiber-network models.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

Individual electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL) fibers were mechanically tested using a CellScale MicroTester G2. Single fibers were mounted on a custom collector and loaded using a three-point-bending-style fixture: a steel beam (0.1016 mm diameter for “small strain” tests; 0.1524 mm for “large strain” tests) was manually positioned to the midspan of the fiber and then displaced vertically to bisect and extend the fiber, which the authors modeled as two uniaxially stretched fiber segments. A 200 µm pre-displacement was applied to ensure initial tension, and the setup was submerged in water prior to testing to reduce vibrational noise. The MicroTester executed cyclic loading protocols at prescribed displacement rates (e.g., ~13 µm/s loading and ~7 µm/s unloading for the small-strain set), applying two cycles at each incremental strain level (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% for small-strain; and 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100% for large-strain). Beam kinematics were optically tracked (vertical and horizontal tip motion), and fiber forces were derived from the known beam stiffness and measured tip displacement to generate force–displacement (and force–time) responses used for viscoelastic/damage modeling.
AUTHORS

Sascha L. Granhold, Alberto Madariaga, Matthew J. Lohr, Sarah Jones, Andrew J. Robinson, Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez, Emma Lejeune, Berkin Dortdivanlioglu, Manuel K. Rausch.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Advanced Engineering Materials

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

The University of Texas at Austin, Boston University

COUNTRIES

United States

INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

TESTING METHODS

Fibre TestingFlexural and Bending TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical TestingUltra Low Force TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Material Fatigue and DurabilityPolymers and Elastomers Testing

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Tailorable Hydrogel Fibers from High-Yield Recombinant Hagfish Intermediate Filament Proteins: A New Frontier in Biomimetic Materials

Bell BE, Wasserman O, et al.

ACS Omega

MicroTester

Flexural and Bending TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingMembranes and Thin Films Mechanics

2026

SPHERpower: MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent lead to the efficient restoration of the scarred vocal folds

Shpichka A, Svistushkin M, et al.

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

MicroTester

Indentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingStem Cell Mechanobiology

2026

Formation of assembloids by DNA-mediated synthetic cell self-assembly

Burgstaller A, Lopez Lopez EA, et al.

Soft Matter

MicroTester

Compression TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Microtissue and Spheroid MechanicsOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: