PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

Multilayer Electrospun Poly(L-Lactic Acid)/Polyacrylonitrile (PLLA/PAN) Mesoporous Matrices: Structural Design and Properties

Montoille L, Álvarez-Carrasco F, et al.

ACS Applied Polymer Materials

Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Universidad de Las Américas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Centro de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Industrial

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study developed hierarchical mesoporous electrospun scaffolds using a five-layer, sequence-controlled architecture combining poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) to tune porosity/transport and mechanical performance for biomedical fibrous matrices. Two multilayer stacks (PLLA/PAN/PLLA/PAN/PLLA and PAN/PLLA/PAN/PLLA/PAN) were compared to neat PLLA and neat PAN controls. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption confirmed mesoporosity (≈9.3–13.7 nm) and multilayers increased BET surface area to ≈15.9–16.9 m²/g versus neat PLLA (≈4.6 m²/g). Surface chemistry of the outermost layer governed wettability and vapor transport: PLLA-faced laminates remained highly hydrophobic (contact angle ≈114°), while PAN-faced laminates exhibited increased wettability (contact angle ≈38°) and higher water vapor permeability. Uniaxial tensile testing showed that multilayer structuring increased stiffness and strength while maintaining ductility, yielding Young’s moduli of ≈18.74 MPa (PLLA/PAN-ML) and ≈28.08 MPa (PAN/PLLA-ML) compared with ≈8.76 MPa (PLLA) and ≈37.70 MPa (PAN); stress–strain behavior was well captured by a Yeoh hyperelastic model (reported R² > 0.99). After PBS immersion, multilayers retained mechanical integrity with sequence-dependent degradation and mechanical retention, and HaCaT keratinocyte assays showed improved viability for multilayers compared with neat PLLA, supporting use in wound-healing/skin-regeneration scaffolds.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

Uniaxial tensile testing of electrospun mats was performed using a CellScale BioTester 5000 configured as a uniaxial tester (described as a biaxial testing machine) following ASTM D882-12 for thin plastic films (<1 mm). Rectangular specimens were tested with a 10 N load cell at a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/min (n=5 per group). Force–displacement was converted to engineering stress–strain using specimen cross-sectional area and gauge length. From the stress–strain curves, Young’s modulus was calculated by linear regression in the elastic region, yield strength was estimated using a 1% offset/displacement method, ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was taken as the maximum stress, and elongation at break was calculated at failure. The same BioTester tensile protocol was repeated after scaffold immersion in PBS (pH 7.4, 37°C) at defined time points (14, 21, and 28 days) to quantify mechanical property retention during hydrolytic exposure and sequence-dependent stability.
AUTHORS

Lissette Montoille, Fabián Álvarez-Carrasco, Fabián Guajardo, Mauricio Gómez-Barrena, Esmeralda López, Eugenio Rivera, Claudio García-Herrera, Paula A. Zapata, Diana Zárate Triviño, Juan José Martínez Sanmiguel, Daniel A. Canales.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

ACS Applied Polymer Materials

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Universidad de Las Américas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Centro de Ingeniería y Desarrollo Industrial

COUNTRIES

Chile, Mexico

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

TESTING METHODS

Tensile Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Membranes and Thin Films MechanicsPolymers and Elastomers TestingScaffold Mechanical TestingSkin and Wound Healing Biomechanics

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Cell-only bioprinting of articular cartilage progenitor cells within a physically constraining support bath to engineer structurally organized grafts

Karam AS, Kronemberger GS, et al.

Bioactive Materials

BioTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

3D Bioprinting & Bioink Materials TestingCartilage and Meniscus MechanicsECM & Decellularized Matrix MechanicsMechanotransductionMusculoskeletal Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

Biomechanical and Functional Response of 3D Printed Materials and Silicone Elastomers Compared to Human Aortic Tissues

Tan V, Eliathamby D, et al.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

BioTester

Biaxial TestingTensile Testing

Heart Valve Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPolymers and Elastomers TestingVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

Electrospun Multilayer Scaffolds Based on Poly (L-Lactic Acid) and Poly (Acrylonitrile) Reinforced with CaO Nanoparticles for Enhanced Skin Regeneration and Wound Healing

Rivera E, Montoille L, et al.

Polymers

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Scaffold Mechanical TestingSkin and Wound Healing Biomechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: