PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2019

Methods of Delivering Mechanical Stimuli to Organ-on-a-Chip

A tensile test divider icon

Kaarj K, Yoon J-Y, et al.

Micromachines

University of Arizona

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This review surveys how mechanical cues are generated and integrated into organ-on-a-chip (OOC) platforms to better recapitulate in vivo-like microenvironments for experimental medicine, disease modelling, drug development, and toxicology. The authors organize the literature around three primary classes of mechanical stimuli used in OOCs—(i) flow-induced shear (laminar, pulsatile, interstitial), (ii) compression, and (iii) stretch/strain—and then summarize the engineering strategies and hardware used to deliver each stimulus (e.g., external syringe/peristaltic pumps, integrated on-chip pumps, passive gravity-driven rocking/perfusion, pressure regulators/controllers, pistons/diaphragms, and vacuum-driven membrane stretching). The review also highlights the need for next-generation OOCs that can deliver multiple mechanical stimuli simultaneously (e.g., combined shear + cyclic strain) to improve physiological fidelity, and discusses considerations for real-time imaging and monitoring of rapid mechanobiological responses.
CellScale hexagons, without text

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTesterMechanoCulture B1MechanoCulture T6

CellScale devices are referenced as commercially available tools used in mechanobiology and organ-on-a-chip workflows (examples summarized in the stretch/strain discussion). The paper cites: (1) the MechanoCulture B1 as a commercial system used to apply cyclic uniaxial stretch (0–10%) to evaluate fibroblast alignment responses; (2) the BioTester as a biaxial mechanical tester used to characterize regional heterogeneity and stress-relaxation behaviour of porcine heart valve leaflets under physiologically relevant biaxial loading ratios; and (3) the MechanoCulture T6 uniaxial stretcher used to apply cyclic radial strain (10% at 1 Hz) to mitral valve anterior leaflets for downstream proteomic analysis. These references position CellScale instrumentation as enabling standardized mechanical stimulation/characterization modules that can be incorporated into broader OoC/mechanobiology studies, rather than being the focus of new primary experiments in this review.
AUTHORS

Kattika Kaarj, Jeong-Yeol Yoon.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Micromachines

YEAR

2019

INSTITUTIONS

University of Arizona

COUNTRIES

United States

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTesterMechanoCulture B1MechanoCulture T6

TESTING METHODS
RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

MechanotransductionOrgan-On-A-Chip Systems

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Postpartum biomechanical adaptations of the anterior abdominal wall in a rat model: Implications for diastasis rectus abdominis

Lax M, Morgan M, et al.

Clinical Biomechanics

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPelvic Floor and Gynecological Biomechanics

2026

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Patient-Specific Direct 3D-Printed Aortic Valve for Simulation Trainings: A Comparative Study

Cheheili Sobbi S, Pavlykova-Chertovska A, et al.

Innovations

BioTester

Digital Image Correlation (DIC)Tensile Testing

Cardiac Tissue Engineering & MechanicsHeart Valve Tissue Engineering & MechanicsPolymers and Elastomers Testing

2026

A deep neural network surrogate for fast mechanical parameter identification using the ring tensile test

Utrera A, Navarrete Á, et al.

Materials & Design

BioTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

MechanotransductionVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest:
CellScale hexagon shapes