PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2020

Human In Vitro Model Mimicking Material-Driven Vascular Regeneration Reveals How Cyclic Stretch and Shear Stress Differentially Modulate Inflammation and Matrix Deposition

van Haaften E E, Wissing T B, et al.

Advanced Biosystems

Eindhoven University of Technology

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study developed a human in vitro vascular-regeneration model to disentangle how physiological hemodynamic loads—cyclic circumferential stretch and flow-driven shear stress—shape the coupled immune response, (myo)fibroblast behavior, and matrix deposition/remodeling that govern early outcomes in in situ vascular tissue engineering. Electrospun supramolecular PCL-bis-urea (PCL-BU) tubular scaffolds (3 mm inner diameter; ~200 µm wall thickness) were seeded with a 2:1 coculture of human primary monocytes and human vena saphena-derived (myo)fibroblasts using fibrin as a carrier and cultured for 20 days in a bioreactor that applied either cyclic stretch (~1.06 at 0.5 Hz), shear stress (~1 Pa), both loads, or static control. Cyclic stretch drove the strongest tissue mass increase and significantly elevated DNA content by day 20, with Ki67 staining indicating proliferation predominantly in vimentin-positive (myo)fibroblasts. At the inflammatory level, cyclic stretch reduced proinflammatory cytokines (notably MCP-1 and IL-6) and, especially when combined with shear stress, increased anti-inflammatory IL-10, indicating a stretch-driven shift toward a less inflammatory environment. Functionally, cyclic stretch stimulated upregulation of matrix-growth genes and increased collagen deposition (favoring thicker/more mature collagen type I), producing the stiffest constructs at day 20. In contrast, shear stress attenuated stretch-induced matrix growth while increasing remodeling signals (MMP-1/TIMP-1), promoting collagen remodeling and stabilizing construct growth. Biaxial mechanics confirmed these divergent outcomes: stretch-only constructs stiffened substantially, whereas adding shear stress largely abrogated this stiffening, yielding stiffness close to the bare scaffold. Overall, the work positions shear stress as a stabilizing regulator of stretch-driven tissue formation and highlights the need to account for both loads when designing resorbable vascular grafts to avoid maladaptive inflammation and remodeling.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

Biaxial tensile characterization of both bare electrospun PCL-BU scaffolds (pre-culture) and 20-day cultured scaffold–tissue constructs was performed using a CellScale BioTester to quantify axial and circumferential stress–stretch behavior under physiological testing conditions. Tests were conducted in PBS at 37°C with optical strain tracking enabled by graphite particles applied to the sample surface. Prior to equibiaxial loading, samples were preconditioned with 10 uniaxial stretch cycles (stretch magnitude 1.10) in each orthogonal direction (axial and circumferential). Constructs were then equibiaxially stretched at 100%/min while forces were recorded with a 1500 mN load cell; sample thickness was measured separately using a digital microscope. Stress–stretch curves were derived assuming incompressibility and plane-stress, and elastic moduli were computed as the slope at 10% strain (stretch 1.10). BioTester results established that bare scaffolds were approximately linear within the applied regime and slightly stiffer axially than circumferentially, and—critically—quantified how loading history altered construct stiffness after culture: cyclic stretch produced the stiffest constructs, while the addition of shear stress largely prevented stretch-induced stiffening (yielding stiffness close to bare scaffold levels). These BioTester outcomes provided the study’s primary mechanical evidence linking hemodynamic loading to matrix deposition versus remodeling during early material-driven vascular regeneration.
AUTHORS

Eline E. van Haaften, Tamar B. Wissing, Nicholas A. Kurniawan, Anthal I. P. M. Smits, Carlijn V. C. Bouten.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Advanced Biosystems

YEAR

2020

INSTITUTIONS

Eindhoven University of Technology

COUNTRIES

Netherlands

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

TESTING METHODS

Biaxial TestingDigital Image Correlation (DIC)Hydrated and Temperature Controlled Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingMechanotransductionScaffold Mechanical TestingVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Nonmulberry Silk Fibroin Doping Boosts Charge Transfer and Charge Injection in Aligned Polypyrrole-Silk Scaffolds for Low-Voltage Neurostimulation

Borah R, Moses JC, et al.

Advanced Materials Interfaces

BioTester

Stress Relaxation TestingTensile TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

Electroactive and Photothermal PolymersPeripheral Nerve Regeneration & PNS MechanicsScaffold Mechanical Testing

2026

Nutrient deprivation of tendon-derived cells and its effect on collagen matrix integrity – mimicking graft remodelling after ACL reconstruction in vitro

Mansoor A K, Dekker S, et al.

Connective Tissue Research

BioTester

Tensile Testing

Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering & MechanicsTendon Tissue Engineering & Ligament Mechanics

2026

Deposition of Ag/TMC Nanoparticles via MAPLE to Enhance the Mechanical and Antimicrobial Properties of Silicone Hydrogel

Pouri H, Langlois S, et al.

ACS Omega

BioTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingOphthalmic Biomechanics & Corneal Tissue EngineeringPolymers and Elastomers TestingWearable Bioelectronics

2025

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: