PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

Characterization of Native Extracellular Matrix of Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Multiforme Organoids

Avera AD, Gibson DJ, et al.

Tissue Engineering Part A

University of Alabama

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study presents a scalable method to generate patient-derived glioblastoma organoids (GBOs) without exogenous extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds (e.g., Matrigel) by pre-forming glioblastoma spheroids (400–600 µm) and then culturing them in a dimpled bioreactor under sublethal shear stress. Organoids reproducibly reached ≥4 mm diameter within ~6–7 weeks and transitioned from homogeneous spheroids to tissue-like, ECM-rich structures when they exceeded ~1–2 mm. RNA-seq revealed the largest transcriptomic shift between 1 mm and 2 mm GBOs, with ECM-associated gene signatures strongly upregulated at ≥2 mm and collagen VI (COL6A3) emerging as a prominent ECM-related change. Biochemical assays and histology confirmed increased sulfated GAGs and collagen in GBOs relative to spheroids, with spatial localization of HA/sGAGs toward the periphery and altered distribution of collagen IV/VI. Mechanical testing showed spheroids (~300 Pa) and 2 mm GBOs (~600 Pa) exhibited stiffness comparable to diffuse low-grade gliomas and demonstrated cyclic hysteresis behavior. Together, the results support GBOs with natively synthesized ECMs as a more physiologically relevant platform for studying early-stage GBM microenvironment development and ECM-targeted therapeutic strategies.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

Compressive modulus testing of glioblastoma spheroids and organoids was performed using a CellScale MicroTester G2 while samples were submerged in neurobasal culture media maintained at 37°C. Individual spheroids/GBOs were transferred into the media bath and equilibrated for 5 minutes before testing. Appropriate cantilever beam sizes were selected based on sample stiffness, and each specimen was subjected to three repeat compression cycles. Compression was limited to 20% of the initial spheroid/organoid size to avoid permanent deformation, using a strain rate of 5 mm/s. Stress–strain curves from the cyclic protocol were used to determine Young’s modulus and to evaluate cycle-to-cycle hysteresis (energy dissipation) and recovery.
AUTHORS

Avera, A.D., Gibson, D.J., Birge, M.L., Schnorbus, T.N., Concannon, I.M., Kim, Y..

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Tissue Engineering Part A

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

University of Alabama

COUNTRIES

United States

INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

TESTING METHODS

Compression TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingUltra Low Force TestingViscoelastic & Time-Dependent Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Cancer MechanobiologyNeural Tissue & CNS MechanicsOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Tailorable Hydrogel Fibers from High-Yield Recombinant Hagfish Intermediate Filament Proteins: A New Frontier in Biomimetic Materials

Bell BE, Wasserman O, et al.

ACS Omega

MicroTester

Flexural and Bending TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingMembranes and Thin Films Mechanics

2026

SPHERpower: MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent lead to the efficient restoration of the scarred vocal folds

Shpichka A, Svistushkin M, et al.

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

MicroTester

Indentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingStem Cell Mechanobiology

2026

Formation of assembloids by DNA-mediated synthetic cell self-assembly

Burgstaller A, Lopez Lopez EA, et al.

Soft Matter

MicroTester

Compression TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Microtissue and Spheroid MechanicsOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: