PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2026

A deep neural network surrogate for fast mechanical parameter identification using the ring tensile test

Utrera A, Navarrete Á, et al.

Materials & Design

Universidad de Santiago de Chile, University of Groningen, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study presents a two-stage inverse-characterization framework that combines deep learning with finite-element modeling to accelerate material parameter identification for small-artery mechanics using the ring tensile test. Because ring tensile loading produces highly nonuniform stress/strain fields (combined flexural, uniaxial, and wire contact effects) and arteries exhibit residual stress in the unloaded tubular state, simplified analytic stress–strain reductions can bias constitutive fits. The authors trained a deep neural network (DNN) surrogate on a large dataset of FEBio ring-tensile simulations using an anisotropic hyperelastic Gasser–Ogden–Holzapfel-type constitutive model, with inputs spanning both material parameters and ring geometry (thickness and inner diameter). Simulation outputs (force–displacement curves) were resampled and compressed with PCA, enabling the DNN to predict curve coefficients efficiently. The DNN is then used to generate near-optimal initial parameter guesses via global optimization, followed by a final FEM-based calibration stage that incorporates residual stresses reconstructed from a ring-opening test. Validation on experimental abdominal aorta samples from Wistar rats showed the DNN surrogate provides strong initial estimates (initial R² ≥ ~0.73 across identified parameters) and enables rapid convergence of the FEM inverse problem in only a few iterations, while sensitivity and extrapolation analyses clarified which parameters most strongly affect ring-test response and where surrogate accuracy degrades outside training bounds. Overall, the work establishes a practical, high-throughput pathway for batch arterial characterization when specimen size/availability constrains conventional multi-axial testing and when full FEM inverse analyses are too computationally expensive to run at scale.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

Mechanical testing data used to train and validate the inverse-characterization pipeline were collected using a CellScale BioTester 5000 biaxial testing machine equipped with a 2.5 N load cell (0.2% accuracy), with specimens immersed in Ca-free Krebs buffer at 38°C to replicate physiological conditions. Two uniaxial protocols were performed. (1) Ring tensile testing: ~2 mm-long cylindrical ring segments were excised from rat abdominal aorta; thickness and inner diameter were measured; rings were mounted using wire myography jaws with two 0.2 mm steel wires passed through the lumen and secured to the jaws; the jaws were displaced at 1.5 mm/min while BioTester force and jaw displacement were recorded to generate ring force–displacement curves. (2) Planar uniaxial tensile testing (longitudinal direction): a ~10 mm arterial segment was cut longitudinally, opened/flattened, dimensions measured (width/thickness), and clamped at both ends; the same displacement rate was applied while force and clamp displacement were recorded, enabling computation of longitudinal stretch and Cauchy stress under incompressibility assumptions. These BioTester datasets were the essential experimental inputs for (i) fitting the DNN surrogate to ring-test mechanics, (ii) providing experimental targets for the subsequent FEM-based inverse optimization, and (iii) supporting sensitivity/extrapolation analyses used to interpret parameter identifiability and improve convergence of the final residual-stress-informed constitutive calibration.
AUTHORS

Andrés Utrera, Álvaro Navarrete, Alejandro Bezmalinovic, Cristóbal Bertoglio, Diego J. Celentano, Claudio García-Herrera.

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Materials & Design

YEAR

2026

INSTITUTIONS

Universidad de Santiago de Chile, University of Groningen, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

COUNTRIES

Chile, Netherlands

INSTRUMENT USED

BioTester

TESTING METHODS

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

MechanotransductionVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Anti-CD31 antibody preconditioning for enhancement of endothelial cell capture and vascularization: a novel strategy for bioengineering lung scaffolds

Kamata S, Zargar A, et al.

Journal of Biological Engineering

BioTester

Tensile Testing

ECM & Decellularized Matrix MechanicsLung and Pleural Tissue BiomechanicsScaffold Mechanical TestingVascular Tissue Engineering & Mechanics

2026

In Vivo Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Oxygen-Supplemented Accelerated Scleral Cross-Linking Over Time in Young Rabbits

Ben Hilal H, Zhang J, et al.

Translational Vision Science & Technology

BioTester

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingTensile Testing

Ophthalmic Biomechanics & Corneal Tissue Engineering

2026

Modeling mechanical and electromechanical behavior of polymers

Shah N H, Ajaj R M, et al.

Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures

BioTester

Biaxial TestingShear TestingTensile Testing

Electroactive and Photothermal PolymersPolymers and Elastomers TestingSoft Robotics Materials

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: