PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATION

2025

Biomechanical properties of lenticules in the ReLEx® SMILE® minimally invasive surgery: Do the age and degree of myopia matter?

Kukanova VS, Dzamikhova AK, et al.

Clinical Biomechanics

Sechenov University, Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences

RESEARCH SUMMARY
This study quantified mechanical properties of human corneal stromal lenticules harvested during ReLEx® SMILE® refractive surgery (122 lenticules; ages 17–47 years; stratified by low/moderate/high myopia) to clarify whether age or myopia severity measurably affects stromal biomechanics. Using multiscale testing (AFM nanoindentation, microscale indentation, and macroscale tensile testing), the authors found wide inter-sample dispersion but no consistent differences between the anterior (Bowman’s-side) and posterior (Descemet’s-side) surfaces. Indentation-derived Young’s moduli were broadly similar across age and myopia groups (AFM means ~54–56 kPa; microindenter values generally higher and more variable), and no robust correlation with axial length was observed. In contrast, whole-lenticule tensile testing (high-strain regime) showed significantly lower tensile modulus for moderate/high myopia compared with low myopia, highlighting method-dependent conclusions and reinforcing that technique, scale, hydration, and loading regime strongly influence apparent corneal stiffness.

CELLSCALE INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

Microscale indentation of SMILE-derived lenticules was performed using a CellScale MicroTester MT G2. Fresh lenticules were transported in saline, cut into halves, and adhered to poly-L-lysine–coated glass; one half was flipped to expose the opposite surface so both the Bowman’s-side (BS) and Descemet’s-side (DS) could be tested. Samples were submerged in PBS in a transparent holder and indented near the central region (≥3 locations per half) at 25°C. A spherical microindenter (0.5 mm radius microsphere) mounted on a 59 mm steel cantilever (spring constant 9.4 N/m) was used. Force–displacement data were processed with a custom MATLAB pipeline using a Hertz contact model corrected for finite sample thickness to calculate Young’s modulus for each side of the lenticule.
AUTHORS

Kukanova V.S., Dzamikhova A.K., Akovantseva A.A., Frolova A.A., Efremov Yu.M., Shilova T.Yu., Svistunov A.A., Avetisov S.E., Timashev P.S., Kotova S.L..

PUBLICATION DETAILS
JOURNAL

Clinical Biomechanics

YEAR

2025

INSTITUTIONS

Sechenov University, Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences

COUNTRIES

Russia

INSTRUMENT USED

MicroTester

TESTING METHODS

Hydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingIndentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

RESEARCH APPLICATIONS

Ophthalmic Biomechanics & Corneal Tissue Engineering

Related Publications:

Instrument Used:
Year:
Testing Method:
Research Application:
Country:

Tailorable Hydrogel Fibers from High-Yield Recombinant Hagfish Intermediate Filament Proteins: A New Frontier in Biomimetic Materials

Bell BE, Wasserman O, et al.

ACS Omega

MicroTester

Flexural and Bending TestingHydrated and Temperature Controlled TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Hydrogel Mechanical TestingMembranes and Thin Films Mechanics

2026

SPHERpower: MSC spheroid-based bioequivalent lead to the efficient restoration of the scarred vocal folds

Shpichka A, Svistushkin M, et al.

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

MicroTester

Indentation TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Fibrosis & Tissue RemodelingStem Cell Mechanobiology

2026

Formation of assembloids by DNA-mediated synthetic cell self-assembly

Burgstaller A, Lopez Lopez EA, et al.

Soft Matter

MicroTester

Compression TestingMicro-Mechanical Testing

Microtissue and Spheroid MechanicsOrganoid and Tissue Mimetic Systems

2026

Contact Sales

Product of Interest: